EasyApache 4 and the new recently released mod_lsapi module.


Technical Support
Staff member

It should be worth noting that for those who simply can't afford Litespeed but want to achieve similar performance should be swapping and adapting to this new recently released module!

We're still working out the best configuration over here in regards to Apache Modules (mpm_prefork/worker/event) and mod_lsapi.

But for those utilizing suphp or dso/ruid2 -- we have seen an increase in performance on the mod_lsapi handler.

Figured I'd make a thread about it to help bring awareness that lsapi has come to cPanel's EasyApache.

Now; this is a lite version compared to the one released for CloudLinux on Dedicated/Cloud(KVM) Servers and Litespeed's direct implementation(lsapi was developed by Litespeed)

We do still recommend that if you can get Litespeed for your server to do get it.

So only CloudVPS and Dedicated server can use this feature?

The two main features of lsapi that are disabled in the cPanel-distributed version of mod_lsapi are CRIU (which requires kernel changes to enable)
Requires a kernel change..


New Member
Staff member
So only CloudVPS and Dedicated server can use this feature?
Not exactly. cPanel servers running EasyApache 4 have the ability to use mod_lsapi now, whether they are using CloudLinux or not. However, the one cPanel provides on the standard kernel lacks a few features CloudLinux offers, and those CloudLinux-specific features will show marginally better performance than the "lite" version of lsapi cPanel provides natively, which may be useful on servers with heavy traffic loads. Some of the differences between native cPanel and CloudLinux mod_lsapi packages are explained in more detail here:


CloudLinux is supported on our Cloud KVM and Dedicated server packages, which allow kernel modifications:

I was reading it wrong, you are right and it's working on my MVPS-5 without any issue (PHP 5.6, 7.1 and 7.2) with mod_lsapi



New Member
Hi @KH-JonathanKW @KH-DanielL

Have you guys performed a benchmark to test mod_lsapi vs other handlers' performances? I found this on the net: https://bigstep.com/blog/using-lsapi-in-whm that says "the current lsapi doesn’t seem to provide a performance boost for WHM servers. At the moment, PHP-FPM appears to be the fastest php processing option available in WHM, by a healthy margin".

Currently I'm using PHP 7.1 - DSO, OPCache and memcached on my CentOS VPS. What's your suggestion? Will it help boosting performance switching to mod_lsapi? I need OPCache and memcached with my Wordpress setup. Is memcached available for PHP 7.3 (or 7.2) for now?
I did not see a difference using mod_lsapi. It's another marketing trick from cPanel and it will probably open up new issues with Apache and PHP getting compromised again and again.

I don't like cPanel anymore at all.


New Member
Staff member
mod_lsapi will provide a significant boost over inefficient handlers like CGI or SUPHP. We only really find PHP-FPM to be beneficial when it comes to websites with massive traffic load, and even in those cases, the max_children and other parameters for each FPM pool must be tuned for the website to work optimally, which is sort of a constant tuning process and not very straightforward to most users. Additionally, some settings for PHP-FPM pools traditionally have been configured with yaml files that were not accessible through cPanel/WHM, such as disabled functions. It's this complexity, as well as additional memory usage for customers that run several websites, why we don't recommend using it in most circumstances.

If you're after the best absolute speed, Litespeed web server is a much better "set it and forget it" solution that is capable of handling very large amounts of traffic with lower overall memory usage, and supports http/2 and QUIC protocols right out of the box. It also supports OPcache.

The main advantage of lsapi at this time is comparable performance with the DSO handler, while being able to be used on all PHP versions at once instead of just one.